Comments for At the end of the day http://sspiro.wordpress.com Something that you say before you say what you believe to be the most important fact of a situation Thu, 15 May 2008 00:03:18 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on “Is Texas about to become the next state to undermine the teaching of evolution?” by airtightnoodle http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/is-texas-about-to-become-the-next-state-to-undermine-the-teaching-of-evolution/#comment-28 airtightnoodle Thu, 15 May 2008 00:03:18 +0000 http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/is-texas-about-to-become-the-next-state-to-undermine-the-teaching-of-evolution/#comment-28 That should have said "getting ready to"..."getting to" doesn't make much sense, does it? That should have said “getting ready to”…”getting to” doesn’t make much sense, does it?

]]> Comment on “Is Texas about to become the next state to undermine the teaching of evolution?” by airtightnoodle http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/is-texas-about-to-become-the-next-state-to-undermine-the-teaching-of-evolution/#comment-27 airtightnoodle Thu, 15 May 2008 00:02:41 +0000 http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/is-texas-about-to-become-the-next-state-to-undermine-the-teaching-of-evolution/#comment-27 Yep...they are getting to review the science standards as we speak...Don McLeroy, the state board's chairman, was interviewed recently and claimed he would vote not to change the science standards. We'll see... Yep…they are getting to review the science standards as we speak…Don McLeroy, the state board’s chairman, was interviewed recently and claimed he would vote not to change the science standards. We’ll see…

]]> Comment on Bad Bioinformatics by Bioinformatics and biochemistry « At the end of the day http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/bad-bioinformatics/#comment-6 Bioinformatics and biochemistry « At the end of the day Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:07:26 +0000 http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/bad-bioinformatics/#comment-6 [...] Comments (RSS) « Bad Bioinformatics [...] [...] Comments (RSS) « Bad Bioinformatics [...]

]]> Comment on Peer reviewing by Pedro Beltrao http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/peer-reviewing/#comment-5 Pedro Beltrao Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:52:17 +0000 http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/peer-reviewing/#comment-5 There should be more of an emphasis during the PhD about all these other tasks like peer reviewing and grant writing. The journals should also change a bit how they access the pool or researchers. Even within the same publishing house they to not have a shared database of referees with information on subject area and performance. They could also participate more directly in teaching students how to peer review. One of the best ways to learn is to read the comments from other referees but apart from Biology Direct and in some cases PLoS ONE there is no access to these reports. There should be more of an emphasis during the PhD about all these other tasks like peer reviewing and grant writing. The journals should also change a bit how they access the pool or researchers. Even within the same publishing house they to not have a shared database of referees with information on subject area and performance. They could also participate more directly in teaching students how to peer review. One of the best ways to learn is to read the comments from other referees but apart from Biology Direct and in some cases PLoS ONE there is no access to these reports.

]]> Comment on Bad Bioinformatics by Manual sequence analysis - some common mistakes « Freelancing science http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/bad-bioinformatics/#comment-4 Manual sequence analysis - some common mistakes « Freelancing science Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:01:44 +0000 http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/bad-bioinformatics/#comment-4 [...] will come back to on many occasions. Publication with very wrong sequence analysis like the one Stephen Spiro pointed out on his blog is not an exception. I may agree that large scale analysis can stand quick and dirty treatment of [...] [...] will come back to on many occasions. Publication with very wrong sequence analysis like the one Stephen Spiro pointed out on his blog is not an exception. I may agree that large scale analysis can stand quick and dirty treatment of [...]

]]> Comment on Peer reviewing by sspiro http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/peer-reviewing/#comment-3 sspiro Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:55:36 +0000 http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/peer-reviewing/#comment-3 My first comment! I love it. My first comment! I love it.

]]> Comment on Peer reviewing by Tịnh Tú http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/peer-reviewing/#comment-2 Tịnh Tú Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:50:55 +0000 http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/peer-reviewing/#comment-2 Chúc mọi người thân tâm thường an lạc. A Di Đà Phật http://phatphap.wordpress.com Chúc mọi người thân tâm thường an lạc.
A Di Đà Phật

http://phatphap.wordpress.com

]]>