<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Bioinformatics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/bad-bioinformatics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/bad-bioinformatics/</link>
	<description>Something that you say before you say what you believe to be the most important fact of a situation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:03:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bioinformatics and biochemistry &#171; At the end of the day</title>
		<link>http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/bad-bioinformatics/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Bioinformatics and biochemistry &#171; At the end of the day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/bad-bioinformatics/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments (RSS)       &#171; Bad&#160;Bioinformatics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments (RSS)       &laquo; Bad&nbsp;Bioinformatics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manual sequence analysis - some common mistakes &#171; Freelancing science</title>
		<link>http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/bad-bioinformatics/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Manual sequence analysis - some common mistakes &#171; Freelancing science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sspiro.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/bad-bioinformatics/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] will come back to on many occasions. Publication with very wrong sequence analysis like the one Stephen Spiro pointed out on his blog is not an exception. I may agree that large scale analysis can stand quick and dirty treatment of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will come back to on many occasions. Publication with very wrong sequence analysis like the one Stephen Spiro pointed out on his blog is not an exception. I may agree that large scale analysis can stand quick and dirty treatment of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
